solved with [wordrider.net]
↧
Re: captcha unreadable, solution?
↧
Youtube - default quality.
Hi.
Can you change default quality from 480p to Highest ?
Can you change default quality from 480p to Highest ?
↧
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
I dont testing it.
But did you implement threshold ?
But did you implement threshold ?
Language: C#public Bitmap Threshold(Bitmap bmp,int tmin,int tmax) { for(y=0;y++;y<bmp.Height) { for(x=0;x++;x<bmp.Width) { Color clr=bmp.GetPixel(x,y); if(clr.R>tmin && clr.G>tmin && clr.B>tmin && clr.R<tmax && clr.G<tmax && clr.B<tmax) { bmp.SetPixel(x,y,Color.black); } else { bmp.SetPixel(x,y,Color.white); } } } return bmp; }
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
There's breakage if you're using Firefox 42 and SlimJS lightweight nightly version (0.10.0pre). If there's no permission problem, the updated plugin in the first post's attachment will auto-fix that. If somehow there's permission problem, you can manually edit "application.ini" it's inside the slimerjs folder. Change "MaxVersion=41" to "MaxVersion=61" (without quotes). I think we're safe for another week :-)
Also SlimerJS standalone stable version is recommended whether you have Firefox installed or not. It's bulkier than the lightweight version, but it's independent from your Firefox installation. Of course you still can use the lightweight version if you have Firefox installed, but another breakages are possible in the future, we'll never know.
@ad48: Thanks, but it's not that simple :-)
Also SlimerJS standalone stable version is recommended whether you have Firefox installed or not. It's bulkier than the lightweight version, but it's independent from your Firefox installation. Of course you still can use the lightweight version if you have Firefox installed, but another breakages are possible in the future, we'll never know.
@ad48: Thanks, but it's not that simple :-)
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
tong2shot wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's breakage if you're using Firefox 42 and
> SlimJS lightweight nightly version (0.10.0pre).
> (snip)
> Also SlimerJS standalone stable version is recommended
> whether you have Firefox installed or not.
> (snip)
> Of course, you still can use the lightweight
> version if you have Firefox installed
Fx 42.0 is the first version in the release (stable) branch
that has been made available also as a 64bit binary
(Win7+ x64; not compatible with WinXP SP2 x64 or
WinVista SP2 x64):
Firefox 42 64-bit version for Windows now available for download
FTP Mozilla
Do you happen to know whether "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
is compatible with Fx 42.0 x64 or in that case the use of
the 32bit "slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (or possibly
slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip) is mandatory?
Many thanks...
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's breakage if you're using Firefox 42 and
> SlimJS lightweight nightly version (0.10.0pre).
> (snip)
> Also SlimerJS standalone stable version is recommended
> whether you have Firefox installed or not.
> (snip)
> Of course, you still can use the lightweight
> version if you have Firefox installed
Fx 42.0 is the first version in the release (stable) branch
that has been made available also as a 64bit binary
(Win7+ x64; not compatible with WinXP SP2 x64 or
WinVista SP2 x64):
Firefox 42 64-bit version for Windows now available for download
FTP Mozilla
Do you happen to know whether "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
is compatible with Fx 42.0 x64 or in that case the use of
the 32bit "slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (or possibly
slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip) is mandatory?
Many thanks...
↧
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
TVjunkie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you happen to know whether
> "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
> is compatible with Fx 42.0 x64 or in that case the
> use of
> the 32bit "slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (or possibly
> slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip) is mandatory?
>
> Many thanks...
Currently I don't have Win7+ 64bit machine laying around. But I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" (lightweight nightly) with Linux 64bit and 32bit, it works fine. So think it will also work with Win7+ 64bit.
"slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (standalone stable) is recommended because it's independent from Firefox installation, it uses its own version of XulRunner. So whatever your version Firefox you're using, it doesn't interfere SlimJS standalone stable installation.
SlimerJS 0.9.6 also has lightweight version (http://download.slimerjs.org/releases/latest-slimerjs-stable/slimerjs-0.9.6.zip), but it doesn't work with Firefox 42, even if MaxVersion=61 is applied for example. In the site's description (https://slimerjs.org/download.html#lightweight), it's stated that the 0.9.6 lightweight edition is compatible with Firefox from 17.0 to 38.0.
How about "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" (lightweight nightly)? At this moment it works with Firefox 42 with MaxVersion=61 applied. But because it depends on Firefox installation, there is no guarantee to work with future version of Firefox.
Users have options of course, whether to install the standalone stable, or the lightweight nightly, or any other versions. But when it comes to support, it would be easier for us to handle if users choose the standalone stable. So unless you know what you're doing, choose the standalone stable (currently slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip).
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you happen to know whether
> "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
> is compatible with Fx 42.0 x64 or in that case the
> use of
> the 32bit "slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (or possibly
> slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip) is mandatory?
>
> Many thanks...
Currently I don't have Win7+ 64bit machine laying around. But I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" (lightweight nightly) with Linux 64bit and 32bit, it works fine. So think it will also work with Win7+ 64bit.
"slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (standalone stable) is recommended because it's independent from Firefox installation, it uses its own version of XulRunner. So whatever your version Firefox you're using, it doesn't interfere SlimJS standalone stable installation.
SlimerJS 0.9.6 also has lightweight version (http://download.slimerjs.org/releases/latest-slimerjs-stable/slimerjs-0.9.6.zip), but it doesn't work with Firefox 42, even if MaxVersion=61 is applied for example. In the site's description (https://slimerjs.org/download.html#lightweight), it's stated that the 0.9.6 lightweight edition is compatible with Firefox from 17.0 to 38.0.
How about "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" (lightweight nightly)? At this moment it works with Firefox 42 with MaxVersion=61 applied. But because it depends on Firefox installation, there is no guarantee to work with future version of Firefox.
Users have options of course, whether to install the standalone stable, or the lightweight nightly, or any other versions. But when it comes to support, it would be easier for us to handle if users choose the standalone stable. So unless you know what you're doing, choose the standalone stable (currently slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip).
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
tong2shot wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
> (lightweight nightly) with Linux 64bit and 32bit,
> it works fine. So think it will also work with Win7+ 64bit.
Thanks for your reply, but did you actually test
"slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" on Linux-64bit having
installed previously the 64bit flavour of Fx 42.0:
42.0/linux-x86_64
To rephrase, would "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
successfully use the core XUL engine of Fx 42.0 64bit
(obviously in a 64bit architecture), provided
of course one uses the MaxVersionNumber
hack you posted?
My sister runs Fx 42.0 x64 on Win7 SP1 x64,
but I won't be able to test before the start of next
week (back home from trip...).
> So, whatever your version Firefox you're using,
> it doesn't interfere with SlimJS standalone stable installation.
> (snip)
> unless you know what you're doing, choose the standalone
> stable (currently slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip).
Would you then advise against using the
slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip full (standalone)
nightly version linked to in my previous post?
Sorry for being such a PITA, your hard work
and proposed solutions are greatly appreciated >:D<
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
> (lightweight nightly) with Linux 64bit and 32bit,
> it works fine. So think it will also work with Win7+ 64bit.
Thanks for your reply, but did you actually test
"slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" on Linux-64bit having
installed previously the 64bit flavour of Fx 42.0:
42.0/linux-x86_64
To rephrase, would "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
successfully use the core XUL engine of Fx 42.0 64bit
(obviously in a 64bit architecture), provided
of course one uses the MaxVersionNumber
hack you posted?
My sister runs Fx 42.0 x64 on Win7 SP1 x64,
but I won't be able to test before the start of next
week (back home from trip...).
> So, whatever your version Firefox you're using,
> it doesn't interfere with SlimJS standalone stable installation.
> (snip)
> unless you know what you're doing, choose the standalone
> stable (currently slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip).
Would you then advise against using the
slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip full (standalone)
nightly version linked to in my previous post?
Sorry for being such a PITA, your hard work
and proposed solutions are greatly appreciated >:D<
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
TVjunkie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for your reply, but did you actually test
>
> "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" on Linux-64bit having
> installed previously the 64bit flavour of Fx 42.0:
Yes, I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" with Firefox 42 on both Linux 32bit and 64bit, respective to the arch. And it works fine.
> Would you then advise against using the
> slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip full (standalone)
> nightly version linked to in my previous post?
The standalone nightly version falls into "any other versions". So yes.
In other news, recaptcha plugin v1.1.0 which contains SlimerJS support code has just been release. If someone has better ideas/approach we can just rewrite the plugin.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for your reply, but did you actually test
>
> "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" on Linux-64bit having
> installed previously the 64bit flavour of Fx 42.0:
Yes, I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" with Firefox 42 on both Linux 32bit and 64bit, respective to the arch. And it works fine.
> Would you then advise against using the
> slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip full (standalone)
> nightly version linked to in my previous post?
The standalone nightly version falls into "any other versions". So yes.
In other news, recaptcha plugin v1.1.0 which contains SlimerJS support code has just been release. If someone has better ideas/approach we can just rewrite the plugin.
↧
Re: Unreadable ReCaptcha
tong2shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" with Firefox 42
> on both Linux 32bit and 64bit,
> respective to the arch. And it works fine.
Thanks for the additional clarification :-)
> In other news, recaptcha plugin v1.1.0, which
> contains SlimerJS support code, has just been
> released.
Complemented by updated solvemediacaptcha
v1.1.3 plugin ;-)
Many cheers >:D<
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" with Firefox 42
> on both Linux 32bit and 64bit,
> respective to the arch. And it works fine.
Thanks for the additional clarification :-)
> In other news, recaptcha plugin v1.1.0, which
> contains SlimerJS support code, has just been
> released.
Complemented by updated solvemediacaptcha
v1.1.3 plugin ;-)
Many cheers >:D<
↧
↧
Re: What plugins people want
↧
Re: What plugins people want
I am not sure if it is possible but I think FRD handled already link containers before. Here is an example file for filecrypt that I would appreciate very much:
[www.filecrypt.cc]
This one contains links and a mirror: share-online.biz & uploaded.net
This specific file is password protected, password is "serienjunkies.org".
Is there a way to decrypt links from such websites anyway? I had to resort again to JD which is, I say again, horrible and hideous.
Cheers,
Stonn
[www.filecrypt.cc]
This one contains links and a mirror: share-online.biz & uploaded.net
This specific file is password protected, password is "serienjunkies.org".
Is there a way to decrypt links from such websites anyway? I had to resort again to JD which is, I say again, horrible and hideous.
Cheers,
Stonn
↧
badly need a plugin for this site
↧
Re: zippy not working
I suddenly got "download button id not found" on FRD 0.9.4 with Zippyshare plugin version 1.14.28. This is an example file:
[www94.zippyshare.com]
Anyone know how to get this to start correctly? There's no captcha in FF, as it downloads automatically there.
Thanks for any help or possibility to update the plugin.
[www94.zippyshare.com]
Anyone know how to get this to start correctly? There's no captcha in FF, as it downloads automatically there.
Thanks for any help or possibility to update the plugin.
↧
↧
flashX.tv - Problem (File not Found)
Welcome...
Congratulations . A good application . Does not work plugin flashX.tv You can ask for updates. Thanks .
![]()
Regards,
Congratulations . A good application . Does not work plugin flashX.tv You can ask for updates. Thanks .
Regards,
↧
Re: zippy not working
raybestos Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suddenly got "download button id not found" on
> FRD 0.9.4 with Zippyshare plugin version 1.14.28.
> This is an example file:
>
> [www94.zippyshare.com]
>
> Anyone know how to get this to start correctly?
> There's no captcha in FF, as it downloads
> automatically there.
>
> Thanks for any help or possibility to update the
> plugin.
Me too
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suddenly got "download button id not found" on
> FRD 0.9.4 with Zippyshare plugin version 1.14.28.
> This is an example file:
>
> [www94.zippyshare.com]
>
> Anyone know how to get this to start correctly?
> There's no captcha in FF, as it downloads
> automatically there.
>
> Thanks for any help or possibility to update the
> plugin.
Me too
↧
Re: cloud.mail.ru
Thanks
↧
uloz.to not working
Zdarec,
od vcera nefunguje plugin na ULOZ.TO.
Hlasi to chybu: The server uloz.to failed to respond with a valid to HTTP response.
od vcera nefunguje plugin na ULOZ.TO.
Hlasi to chybu: The server uloz.to failed to respond with a valid to HTTP response.
↧
↧
Re: uloz.to not working
↧
Re: zippy not working
Plugin v1.14.29 should work again.
↧
Re: uloz.to not working
@mattaj: neplas, funguje normalne
↧